--- name: investor-materials description: Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets. origin: ECC --- # Investor Materials Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend. ## When to Activate - creating or revising a pitch deck - writing an investor memo or one-pager - building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table - answering accelerator or incubator application questions - aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth ## Golden Rule All investor materials must agree with each other. Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing: - traction metrics - pricing and revenue assumptions - raise size and instrument - use of funds - team bios and titles - milestones and timelines If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting. ## Core Workflow 1. inventory the canonical facts 2. identify missing assumptions 3. choose the asset type 4. draft the asset with explicit logic 5. cross-check every number against the source of truth ## Asset Guidance ### Pitch Deck Recommended flow: 1. company + wedge 2. problem 3. solution 4. product / demo 5. market 6. business model 7. traction 8. team 9. competition / differentiation 10. ask 11. use of funds / milestones 12. appendix If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with `frontend-slides`. ### One-Pager / Memo - state what the company does in one clean sentence - show why now - include traction and proof points early - make the ask precise - keep claims easy to verify ### Financial Model Include: - explicit assumptions - bear / base / bull cases when useful - clean layer-by-layer revenue logic - milestone-linked spending - sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions ### Accelerator Applications - answer the exact question asked - prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage - avoid puffery - keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model ## Red Flags to Avoid - unverifiable claims - fuzzy market sizing without assumptions - inconsistent team roles or titles - revenue math that does not sum cleanly - inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile ## Pitch Deck Structure (10-12 slides) Recommended flow with guidance per slide: 1. **Title:** Company name + one-line positioning 2. **Problem:** Quantify the pain. Use specific market numbers. 3. **Solution:** Show the product, not a description of it. Screenshots, demo frames, or architecture diagrams. 4. **Product demo:** Phase 1 (live) vs Phase 2 (funded). Always present as phased if not fully built. 5. **Market:** TAM with source. Growth rate with source. Key catalyst for "why now." 6. **Business model:** Revenue layers with year-by-year projections. Show the math. 7. **Traction:** Working product, users, revenue, waitlist, partnerships. Concrete numbers only. 8. **Team:** Each founder gets a credibility anchor (prior company, metric, recognition). 9. **Competitive landscape:** Positioning map or table. Show the gap you fill. 10. **Ask:** Raise amount, instrument (SAFE/priced), valuation range. 11. **Milestones / Use of funds:** Timeline from now to Series A. Use of funds must sum exactly. 12. **Appendix:** Revenue model detail, regulatory strategy, technical architecture. ## Financial Model Requirements When building or updating financial models: - All assumptions must be stated explicitly and separately from projections - Include bear/base/bull scenarios (sensitivity analysis) - Revenue layers must sum correctly across all timeframes - Use of funds must sum to the exact raise amount - Include unit economics where possible (cost per user, revenue per customer) - Discount rates and growth rates must be sourced or justified - Milestone-linked spending: tie spend to specific milestones ## Accelerator Applications When writing accelerator applications: - Follow the specific word/character limits of each program - Lead with traction (metrics, users, revenue, recognition) - Be specific about what the accelerator adds (network, funding, customers) - Never sound desperate. Frame as mutual fit. - Keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model ## Honesty Requirements These are non-negotiable: - Clearly distinguish between what is live/working and what requires funding - Never attach revenue figures to things that are not revenue-generating - Never claim awards or recognition not actually received - "Algorithmic" when the tech is algorithmic, "AI" only when there is actual ML/AI - All traction claims must be verifiable ## Quality Gate Before delivering: - every number matches the current source of truth - use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly - assumptions are visible, not buried - the story is clear without hype language - the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting - phase distinctions (live vs funded) are clear - no unverifiable claims - team roles and titles are correct