9.0 KiB
name, description, origin
| name | description | origin |
|---|---|---|
| lead-intelligence | AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, and personalized outreach. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts. | ECC |
Lead Intelligence
Agent-powered lead intelligence pipeline that finds, scores, and reaches high-value contacts through social graph analysis and warm path discovery.
When to Activate
- User wants to find leads or prospects in a specific industry
- Building an outreach list for partnerships, sales, or fundraising
- Researching who to reach out to and the best path to reach them
- User says "find leads", "outreach list", "who should I reach out to", "warm intros"
- Needs to score or rank a list of contacts by relevance
- Wants to map mutual connections to find warm introduction paths
Tool Requirements
Required
- Exa MCP — Deep web search for people, companies, and signals (
web_search_exa) - X API — Follower/following graph, mutual analysis, recent activity (
X_BEARER_TOKEN,X_ACCESS_TOKEN)
Optional (enhance results)
- LinkedIn — Via browser-use MCP or direct API for connection graph
- Apollo/Clay API — For enrichment cross-reference if user has access
- GitHub MCP — For developer-centric lead qualification
Pipeline Overview
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ 1. Signal │────>│ 2. Mutual │────>│ 3. Warm Path │────>│ 4. Enrich │────>│ 5. Outreach │
│ Scoring │ │ Ranking │ │ Discovery │ │ │ │ Draft │
└─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
Stage 1: Signal Scoring
Search for high-signal people in target verticals. Assign a weight to each based on:
| Signal | Weight | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Role/title alignment | 30% | Exa, LinkedIn |
| Industry match | 25% | Exa company search |
| Recent activity on topic | 20% | X API search, Exa |
| Follower count / influence | 10% | X API |
| Location proximity | 10% | Exa, LinkedIn |
| Engagement with your content | 5% | X API interactions |
Signal Search Approach
# Step 1: Define target parameters
target_verticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"]
target_roles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"]
target_locations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
# Step 2: Exa deep search for people
for vertical in target_verticals:
results = web_search_exa(
query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO",
category="company",
numResults=20
)
# Score each result
# Step 3: X API search for active voices
x_search = search_recent_tweets(
query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools",
max_results=100
)
# Extract and score unique authors
Stage 2: Mutual Ranking
For each scored target, analyze the user's social graph to find the warmest path.
Algorithm
- Pull user's X following list and LinkedIn connections
- For each high-signal target, check for shared connections
- Rank mutuals by:
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Number of connections to targets | 40% — highest weight, most connections = highest rank |
| Mutual's current role/company | 20% — decision maker vs individual contributor |
| Mutual's location | 15% — same city = easier intro |
| Industry alignment | 15% — same vertical = natural intro |
| Mutual's X handle / LinkedIn | 10% — identifiability for outreach |
Weighted Bridge Ranking
Treat this as the canonical network-ranking stage for lead intelligence. Do not run a separate graph skill when this stage is enough.
Given:
T= target leadsM= your mutuals / existing connectionsd(m, t)= shortest hop distance from mutualmto targettw(t)= target weight from signal scoring
Compute the base bridge score for each mutual:
B(m) = Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m,t) - 1)
Where:
λis the decay factor, usually0.5- a direct connection contributes full value
- each extra hop halves the contribution
For second-order reach, expand one level into the mutual's own network:
B_ext(m) = B(m) + α · Σ_{m' ∈ N(m) \\ M} Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m',t))
Where:
N(m) \\ Mis the set of people the mutual knows that you do notαis the second-order discount, usually0.3
Then rank by response-adjusted bridge value:
R(m) = B_ext(m) · (1 + β · engagement(m))
Where:
engagement(m)is a normalized responsiveness scoreβis the engagement bonus, usually0.2
Interpretation:
- Tier 1: high
R(m)and direct bridge paths -> warm intro asks - Tier 2: medium
R(m)and one-hop bridge paths -> conditional intro asks - Tier 3: no viable bridge -> direct cold outreach using the same lead record
Output Format
MUTUAL RANKING REPORT
=====================
#1 @mutual_handle (Score: 92)
Name: Jane Smith
Role: Partner @ Acme Ventures
Location: San Francisco
Connections to targets: 7
Connected to: @target1, @target2, @target3, @target4, @target5, @target6, @target7
Best intro path: Jane invested in Target1's company
#2 @mutual_handle2 (Score: 85)
...
Stage 3: Warm Path Discovery
For each target, find the shortest introduction chain:
You ──[follows]──> Mutual A ──[invested in]──> Target Company
You ──[follows]──> Mutual B ──[co-founded with]──> Target Person
You ──[met at]──> Event ──[also attended]──> Target Person
Path Types (ordered by warmth)
- Direct mutual — You both follow/know the same person
- Portfolio connection — Mutual invested in or advises target's company
- Co-worker/alumni — Mutual worked at same company or attended same school
- Event overlap — Both attended same conference/program
- Content engagement — Target engaged with mutual's content or vice versa
Stage 4: Enrichment
For each qualified lead, pull:
- Full name, current title, company
- Company size, funding stage, recent news
- Recent X posts (last 30 days) — topics, tone, interests
- Mutual interests with user (shared follows, similar content)
- Recent company events (product launch, funding round, hiring)
Enrichment Sources
- Exa: company data, news, blog posts
- X API: recent tweets, bio, followers
- GitHub: open source contributions (for developer-centric leads)
- LinkedIn (via browser-use): full profile, experience, education
Stage 5: Outreach Draft
Generate personalized outreach for each lead. Two modes:
Warm Intro Request (to mutual)
hey [mutual name],
quick ask. i see you know [target name] at [company].
i'm building [your product] which [1-line relevance to target].
would you be open to a quick intro? happy to send you a
forwardable blurb.
[your name]
Direct Cold Outreach (to target)
hey [target name],
[specific reference to their recent work/post/announcement].
i'm [your name], building [product]. [1 line on why this is
relevant to them specifically].
[specific low-friction ask].
[your name]
Anti-Patterns (never do)
- Generic templates with no personalization
- Long paragraphs explaining your whole company
- Multiple asks in one message
- Fake familiarity ("loved your recent talk!" without specifics)
- Bulk-sent messages with visible merge fields
Configuration
Users should set these environment variables:
# Required
export X_BEARER_TOKEN="..."
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN="..."
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET="..."
export X_API_KEY="..."
export X_API_SECRET="..."
export EXA_API_KEY="..."
# Optional
export LINKEDIN_COOKIE="..." # For browser-use LinkedIn access
export APOLLO_API_KEY="..." # For Apollo enrichment
Agents
This skill includes specialized agents in the agents/ subdirectory:
- signal-scorer — Searches and ranks prospects by relevance signals
- mutual-mapper — Maps social graph connections and finds warm paths
- enrichment-agent — Pulls detailed profile and company data
- outreach-drafter — Generates personalized messages
Example Usage
User: find me the top 20 people in prediction markets I should reach out to
Agent workflow:
1. signal-scorer searches Exa and X for prediction market leaders
2. mutual-mapper checks user's X graph for shared connections
3. enrichment-agent pulls company data and recent activity
4. outreach-drafter generates personalized messages for top ranked leads
Output: Ranked list with warm paths and draft outreach for each