mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-04-05 00:33:27 +08:00
Ports functionality from 10+ separate plugins into ECC so users only need one plugin installed. Consolidates: pr-review-toolkit, feature-dev, commit-commands, hookify, code-simplifier, security-guidance, frontend-design, explanatory-output-style, and personal skills. New agents (8): code-architect, code-explorer, code-simplifier, comment-analyzer, conversation-analyzer, pr-test-analyzer, silent-failure-hunter, type-design-analyzer New commands (9): commit, commit-push-pr, clean-gone, review-pr, feature-dev, hookify, hookify-list, hookify-configure, hookify-help New skills (8): frontend-design, hookify-rules, github-ops, knowledge-ops, lead-intelligence, oura-health, pmx-guidelines, remotion Enhanced skills (8): article-writing, content-engine, market-research, investor-materials, investor-outreach, x-api, security-scan, autonomous-loops — merged with personal skill content New hook: security-reminder.py (pattern-based OWASP vulnerability warnings on file edits) Totals: 36 agents, 69 commands, 128 skills, 29 hook scripts
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
description
| description |
|---|
| Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents |
Run a comprehensive, multi-perspective review of a pull request.
Usage
/review-pr [PR-number-or-URL] [--focus=comments|tests|errors|types|code|simplify]
If no PR specified, review the current branch's PR. If no focus specified, run all reviews.
Steps
-
Identify the PR: Use
gh pr viewto get PR details, changed files, and diff -
Find project guidelines: Look for CLAUDE.md, .eslintrc, tsconfig.json, etc.
-
Launch specialized review agents (in parallel where possible):
Agent Focus code-reviewer Code quality, bugs, security, style guide adherence comment-analyzer Comment accuracy, completeness, maintainability pr-test-analyzer Test coverage quality and completeness silent-failure-hunter Silent failures, inadequate error handling type-design-analyzer Type design, invariants, encapsulation code-simplifier Code clarity, consistency, maintainability -
Aggregate results: Collect findings, deduplicate, rank by severity
-
Report: Present organized findings grouped by severity (Critical > Important > Advisory)
Confidence Scoring
Only report issues with confidence ≥ 80:
- Critical (90-100): Bugs, security vulnerabilities, data loss risks
- Important (80-89): Style violations, missing tests, code quality
- Advisory (<80): Suggestions, nice-to-haves (only if explicitly requested)