Files
everything-claude-code/skills/search-first/SKILL.md
Stanislav Chernov 48dafdd288 fix: add origin metadata to skills for traceability
Add origin field to all skill files to track their source repository.
This enables users to identify where distributed skills originated from.
Fixes affaan-m/everything-claude-code#246
2026-02-23 19:00:57 +03:00

6.4 KiB

name, description, origin
name description origin
search-first Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent. ECC

/search-first — Research Before You Code

Systematizes the "search for existing solutions before implementing" workflow.

Trigger

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new feature that likely has existing solutions
  • Adding a dependency or integration
  • The user asks "add X functionality" and you're about to write code
  • Before creating a new utility, helper, or abstraction

Workflow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. NEED ANALYSIS                           │
│     Define what functionality is needed      │
│     Identify language/framework constraints  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. PARALLEL SEARCH (researcher agent)      │
│     ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐  │
│     │  npm /   │ │  MCP /   │ │  GitHub / │  │
│     │  PyPI    │ │  Skills  │ │  Web      │  │
│     └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. EVALUATE                                │
│     Score candidates (functionality, maint, │
│     community, docs, license, deps)         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. DECIDE                                  │
│     ┌─────────┐  ┌──────────┐  ┌─────────┐  │
│     │  Adopt  │  │  Extend  │  │  Build   │  │
│     │ as-is   │  │  /Wrap   │  │  Custom  │  │
│     └─────────┘  └──────────┘  └─────────┘  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. IMPLEMENT                               │
│     Install package / Configure MCP /       │
│     Write minimal custom code               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Decision Matrix

Signal Action
Exact match, well-maintained, MIT/Apache Adopt — install and use directly
Partial match, good foundation Extend — install + write thin wrapper
Multiple weak matches Compose — combine 2-3 small packages
Nothing suitable found Build — write custom, but informed by research

How to Use

Quick Mode (inline)

Before writing a utility or adding functionality, mentally run through:

  1. Is this a common problem? → Search npm/PyPI
  2. Is there an MCP for this? → Check ~/.claude/settings.json and search
  3. Is there a skill for this? → Check ~/.claude/skills/
  4. Is there a GitHub template? → Search GitHub

Full Mode (agent)

For non-trivial functionality, launch the researcher agent:

Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="
  Research existing tools for: [DESCRIPTION]
  Language/framework: [LANG]
  Constraints: [ANY]

  Search: npm/PyPI, MCP servers, Claude Code skills, GitHub
  Return: Structured comparison with recommendation
")

Search Shortcuts by Category

Development Tooling

  • Linting → eslint, ruff, textlint, markdownlint
  • Formatting → prettier, black, gofmt
  • Testing → jest, pytest, go test
  • Pre-commit → husky, lint-staged, pre-commit

AI/LLM Integration

  • Claude SDK → Context7 for latest docs
  • Prompt management → Check MCP servers
  • Document processing → unstructured, pdfplumber, mammoth

Data & APIs

  • HTTP clients → httpx (Python), ky/got (Node)
  • Validation → zod (TS), pydantic (Python)
  • Database → Check for MCP servers first

Content & Publishing

  • Markdown processing → remark, unified, markdown-it
  • Image optimization → sharp, imagemin

Integration Points

With planner agent

The planner should invoke researcher before Phase 1 (Architecture Review):

  • Researcher identifies available tools
  • Planner incorporates them into the implementation plan
  • Avoids "reinventing the wheel" in the plan

With architect agent

The architect should consult researcher for:

  • Technology stack decisions
  • Integration pattern discovery
  • Existing reference architectures

With iterative-retrieval skill

Combine for progressive discovery:

  • Cycle 1: Broad search (npm, PyPI, MCP)
  • Cycle 2: Evaluate top candidates in detail
  • Cycle 3: Test compatibility with project constraints

Examples

Need: Check markdown files for broken links
Search: npm "markdown dead link checker"
Found: textlint-rule-no-dead-link (score: 9/10)
Action: ADOPT — npm install textlint-rule-no-dead-link
Result: Zero custom code, battle-tested solution

Example 2: "Add HTTP client wrapper"

Need: Resilient HTTP client with retries and timeout handling
Search: npm "http client retry", PyPI "httpx retry"
Found: got (Node) with retry plugin, httpx (Python) with built-in retry
Action: ADOPT — use got/httpx directly with retry config
Result: Zero custom code, production-proven libraries

Example 3: "Add config file linter"

Need: Validate project config files against a schema
Search: npm "config linter schema", "json schema validator cli"
Found: ajv-cli (score: 8/10)
Action: ADOPT + EXTEND — install ajv-cli, write project-specific schema
Result: 1 package + 1 schema file, no custom validation logic

Anti-Patterns

  • Jumping to code: Writing a utility without checking if one exists
  • Ignoring MCP: Not checking if an MCP server already provides the capability
  • Over-customizing: Wrapping a library so heavily it loses its benefits
  • Dependency bloat: Installing a massive package for one small feature