mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-05-18 23:03:06 +08:00
The `pull_request_target` rule's `expressionPattern` matches only
the canonical `github.event.pull_request.head.{ref,sha,repo.full_name}`
interpolations. It does not match the second canonical form of
the same exploit — fetching `refs/pull/<N>/{head,merge}` directly:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge
The merge-ref variant is what GitHub's own security guidance calls
out as the highest-severity privilege-escalation pattern under
`pull_request_target`: it materialises the PR's merge commit
(attacker code spliced with base), executes inside a workflow that
has full repo-scoped tokens, and gives the attacker the chance to
exfiltrate secrets or push to default branches. `refs/pull/N/head`
is functionally equivalent — same source, same trust boundary.
Reproduced on `main` before this commit:
$ cat /tmp/bad.yml
name: bad
on: { pull_request_target: { types: [opened] } }
permissions: { contents: read }
jobs:
do:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge
persist-credentials: false
- run: npm ci --ignore-scripts
$ ECC_WORKFLOWS_DIR=/tmp node scripts/ci/validate-workflow-security.js
Validated workflow security for 1 workflow files
$ echo $?
0
Expected: violation flagging the refs/pull checkout under pull_request_target.
Actual: passes silently.
Fix: add a `refPattern` to the `pull_request_target` rule:
/^\s*ref:\s*['"]?[^'"\n]*refs\/(?:remotes\/)?pull\/[^'"\n\s]+/m
and apply it per checkout step inside the existing
event-gated loop. The pattern matches the ref VALUE so it catches
all interpolation shapes — `refs/pull/123/head`,
`refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge`,
`${{ env.FOO }}/refs/pull/N/head` — without enumerating the
possible interpolations themselves.
Scoping: the rule is already gated on the workflow containing
`pull_request_target:`, so non-privileged `pull_request` workflows
that legitimately check out a PR ref are not affected.
After this commit the reproduction above exits 1 with:
ERROR: bad.yml:10 - pull_request_target must not checkout an untrusted pull_request head ref/repository
Three new regression tests in `tests/ci/validate-workflow-security.test.js`:
- rejects pull_request_target + refs/pull/<N>/merge
- rejects pull_request_target + hardcoded refs/pull/<N>/head
- allows pull_request_target with no `with.ref:` (base-ref checkout —
the safe pattern from GitHub's own guidance)
Test count: 17 → 20 in this file; full `yarn test` still green.
Together with the previous commit, this closes the two
independent `validate-workflow-security.js` bypasses I found.
244 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
244 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
/**
|
|
* Validate workflow security guardrails for privileged GitHub Actions events.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const assert = require('assert');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const os = require('os');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const { spawnSync } = require('child_process');
|
|
|
|
const SCRIPT_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', 'scripts', 'ci', 'validate-workflow-security.js');
|
|
|
|
function test(name, fn) {
|
|
try {
|
|
fn();
|
|
console.log(` ✓ ${name}`);
|
|
return true;
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.log(` ✗ ${name}`);
|
|
console.log(` Error: ${error.message}`);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function runValidator(files) {
|
|
const tempDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'ecc-workflow-security-'));
|
|
try {
|
|
for (const [name, contents] of Object.entries(files)) {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tempDir, name), contents);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return spawnSync('node', [SCRIPT_PATH], {
|
|
encoding: 'utf8',
|
|
env: {
|
|
...process.env,
|
|
ECC_WORKFLOWS_DIR: tempDir,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
fs.rmSync(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function run() {
|
|
console.log('\n=== Testing workflow security validation ===\n');
|
|
|
|
let passed = 0;
|
|
let failed = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows safe workflow_run workflow that only checks out the base repository', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n workflow_run:\n workflows: ["CI"]\n types: [completed]\njobs:\n repair:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n - run: echo safe\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects workflow_run checkout using github.event.workflow_run.head_branch', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-workflow-run.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n workflow_run:\n workflows: ["CI"]\n types: [completed]\njobs:\n repair:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n ref: \${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_branch }}\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /workflow_run must not checkout an untrusted workflow_run head ref\/repository/);
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /head_branch/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects workflow_run checkout using github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-repository.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n workflow_run:\n workflows: ["CI"]\n types: [completed]\njobs:\n repair:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n repository: \${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name }}\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /head_repository\.full_name/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects pull_request_target checkout using github.event.pull_request.head.sha', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-pr-target.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\n branches: [main]\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n ref: \${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request_target must not checkout an untrusted pull_request head ref\/repository/);
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request\.head\.sha/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
// Quoted action names are valid YAML. The checkout-step filter must still
|
|
// inspect their `with.ref` values in privileged workflows.
|
|
if (test('rejects pull_request_target checkout when uses is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-double-quoted.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\n branches: [main]\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: "actions/checkout@v4"\n with:\n ref: \${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on double-quoted uses:');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request\.head\.sha/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects pull_request_target checkout when uses is single-quoted', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-single-quoted.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\n branches: [main]\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: 'actions/checkout@v4'\n with:\n ref: \${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on single-quoted uses:');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request\.head\.sha/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
// `refs/pull/<N>/{head,merge}` under `pull_request_target` is the canonical
|
|
// privilege-escalation pattern that the standard `github.event.pull_request.head.*`
|
|
// expression check did not cover. Either form pulls attacker-controlled code
|
|
// into a privileged workflow.
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects pull_request_target checkout fetching refs/pull/N/merge', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-pr-target-merge-ref.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\n types: [opened]\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n ref: refs/pull/\${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge\n persist-credentials: false\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on refs/pull/N/merge under pull_request_target');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request_target must not checkout an untrusted pull_request head ref/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects pull_request_target checkout fetching hardcoded refs/pull/N/head', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-pr-target-head-ref.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n ref: refs/pull/123/head\n persist-credentials: false\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on hardcoded refs/pull/N/head');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request_target must not checkout an untrusted pull_request head ref/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows pull_request_target checkout of the base ref (no with.ref)', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe-pr-target-base.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n pull_request_target:\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n persist-credentials: false\n - run: echo inspecting base\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects shared cache use in pull_request_target workflows', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-pr-target-cache.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request_target:\n branches: [main]\njobs:\n inspect:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/cache@v5\n with:\n path: ~/.npm\n key: cache\n - run: echo inspect\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on pull_request_target cache use');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pull_request_target workflows must not restore or save shared dependency caches/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects dependency cache use in ordinary workflows', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-cache.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request:\njobs:\n test:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/cache@v5\n with:\n path: ~/.npm\n key: cache\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on actions/cache use');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /dependency caches are disabled during active supply-chain hardening/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects npm ci without ignore-scripts in any workflow', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-install.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request:\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - run: npm ci\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on npm ci without --ignore-scripts');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /npm ci must include --ignore-scripts/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows package-manager installs with lifecycle scripts disabled', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe-install.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n pull_request:\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - run: |\n npm ci --ignore-scripts\n pnpm install --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile\n yarn install --mode=skip-build\n bun install --ignore-scripts\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects pnpm, yarn, and bun installs that run lifecycle scripts', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-matrix-install.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n pull_request:\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - run: |\n pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile\n yarn install\n bun install\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on script-running installs');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /pnpm install must include --ignore-scripts/);
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /yarn install must use --mode=skip-build/);
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /bun install must include --ignore-scripts/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects checkout credential persistence in workflows with write permissions', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-write-checkout.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\npermissions:\n contents: write\njobs:\n release:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n - run: npm ci --ignore-scripts\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on credential-persisting checkout');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /write permissions must disable checkout credential persistence/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows checkout with disabled credential persistence in workflows with write permissions', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe-write-checkout.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\npermissions:\n contents: write\njobs:\n release:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n persist-credentials: false\n - run: npm ci --ignore-scripts\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
// `permissions: write-all` is GitHub Actions' shorthand for granting every
|
|
// scope write access. The named-scope pattern only catches `contents: write`,
|
|
// `issues: write`, etc., so workflows that opt into write-all were silently
|
|
// exempted from the persist-credentials and --ignore-scripts gates.
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects checkout credential persistence in workflows with permissions: write-all', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-write-all-checkout.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\npermissions: write-all\njobs:\n release:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n - run: npm ci --ignore-scripts\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on write-all + credential-persisting checkout');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /write permissions must disable checkout credential persistence/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects npm ci without ignore-scripts in workflows with permissions: write-all', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-write-all-install.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\npermissions: write-all\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n persist-credentials: false\n - run: npm ci\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on write-all + npm ci without --ignore-scripts');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /npm ci must include --ignore-scripts/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows compliant workflow with permissions: write-all', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe-write-all.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n workflow_dispatch:\npermissions: write-all\njobs:\n release:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/checkout@v4\n with:\n persist-credentials: false\n - run: npm ci --ignore-scripts\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects actions/cache in workflows with id-token write', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-oidc-cache.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n push:\npermissions:\n contents: read\n id-token: write\njobs:\n release:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - uses: actions/cache@v5\n with:\n path: ~/.npm\n key: cache\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail on id-token workflow cache use');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /id-token: write must not restore or save shared dependency caches/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('rejects npm audit without registry signature verification', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'unsafe-audit.yml': `name: Unsafe\non:\n push:\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - run: npm audit --audit-level=high\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(result.status, 0, 'Expected validator to fail when npm audit signatures is missing');
|
|
assert.match(result.stderr, /npm audit must also verify registry signatures/);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
if (test('allows npm audit when registry signatures are verified', () => {
|
|
const result = runValidator({
|
|
'safe-audit.yml': `name: Safe\non:\n push:\njobs:\n audit:\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\n steps:\n - run: |\n npm audit signatures\n npm audit --audit-level=high\n`,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.status, 0, result.stderr || result.stdout);
|
|
})) passed++; else failed++;
|
|
|
|
console.log(`\nPassed: ${passed}`);
|
|
console.log(`Failed: ${failed}`);
|
|
|
|
process.exit(failed > 0 ? 1 : 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
run();
|