mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-04-13 21:33:32 +08:00
chore: checkpoint hermes-generated ops skills
This commit is contained in:
80
skills/hermes-generated/subscription-audit-ops/SKILL.md
Normal file
80
skills/hermes-generated/subscription-audit-ops/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: subscription-audit-ops
|
||||
description: Evidence-first recurring-charge and subscription audit workflow for Hermes. Use when auditing personal spend across cards, recurring merchants, and cancellation candidates under time or cash pressure.
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
hermes:
|
||||
tags: [generated, finance, subscriptions, recurring-charges, credit-karma, email, verification]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Subscription Audit Ops
|
||||
|
||||
Use this when the user asks to audit subscriptions, recurring charges, monthly software spend, or cancellation candidates across personal cards and accounts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Skill Stack
|
||||
|
||||
Pull these imported skills into the workflow when relevant:
|
||||
- `continuous-agent-loop` for bounded multi-step audits with explicit stop conditions when proof is partial
|
||||
- `agentic-engineering` for exact done conditions and the one-to-three-change scope discipline
|
||||
- `market-research` when the user wants vendor or plan comparisons before canceling
|
||||
- `deep-research` and `exa-search` when outside pricing, cancellation flows, or market alternatives need current verification
|
||||
- `search-first` before inventing a custom scraper, parser, or finance helper
|
||||
- `eval-harness` mindset for proof tiers, timestamps, and exact confidence labels
|
||||
|
||||
## When To Use
|
||||
|
||||
- user says `audit my subscriptions`, `what can i cancel`, `find recurring charges`, or similar
|
||||
- the user wants a ruthless keep/cancel pass before a move, budget cut, or runway review
|
||||
- direct card exports are missing and you need to assemble evidence from multiple partial sources
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Start with the freshest finance snapshot available:
|
||||
- read `/Users/affoon/.hermes/workspace/business/financial-status.md`
|
||||
- use it as the source of truth for last verified recurring-charge evidence, card balances, and snapshot timestamp
|
||||
- if it references Credit Karma or other live sources, preserve the exact timestamp in the final answer
|
||||
2. If live Credit Karma is accessible, use browser tools to confirm:
|
||||
- net worth page for balances and recent transactions
|
||||
- manage accounts page for linked institutions and account names
|
||||
- use `browser_vision` on screenshots when the DOM/snapshot truncates or hides account details
|
||||
- distinguish `visible recurring charge`, `recent transaction`, and `linked account` clearly
|
||||
3. If direct transaction exports are unavailable, use fallback evidence layers:
|
||||
- search prior session logs for saved Credit Karma findings and merchant names
|
||||
- inspect known finance files in workspace and memory for previous subscription analyses
|
||||
- use email search for billing/receipt subjects only if it is likely to surface merchant proof
|
||||
- use a passwords export only as account-existence evidence, never as billing proof
|
||||
4. Classify findings into proof tiers:
|
||||
- tier 1: live transaction or current finance snapshot with amount/date
|
||||
- tier 2: prior saved note with explicit price and service
|
||||
- tier 3: account-existence evidence only, needs billing verification
|
||||
5. Build the recommendation set:
|
||||
- `cancel now` for low-value tools with explicit prior cost evidence or obvious move-related services
|
||||
- `verify this week` for plausible subscriptions without live billing proof
|
||||
- `keep for now` for core infra or tools still likely in active use
|
||||
- call out the biggest unresolved swing item, usually the highest-cost ambiguous plan
|
||||
6. Report exact confidence:
|
||||
- say `first-pass audit` if the evidence is partial
|
||||
- never pretend you have a complete ledger unless you saw a full recurring-charge screen or statement export
|
||||
- separate `billing proof`, `account evidence`, and `inference`
|
||||
|
||||
## Heuristics That Worked
|
||||
|
||||
- `financial-status.md` may contain the freshest recurring-charge evidence even when live browser access later fails
|
||||
- prior Apple Notes / knowledge-base subscription analyses are useful for cost baselines, but they are not live proof
|
||||
- Credit Karma `Manage accounts` can expose linked institutions even when transaction detail is sparse
|
||||
- passwords export is good for finding likely paid surfaces like gym, utilities, hosting, SaaS, and media, but should never be used to claim a subscription is active
|
||||
- move-related audits should explicitly check internet, gym, phone, and location-bound services first
|
||||
|
||||
## Pitfalls
|
||||
|
||||
- do not claim `every single subscription` unless you have a current recurring-charge list or statement export
|
||||
- do not turn passwords-export hits into confirmed charges
|
||||
- do not mix `recent transaction` with `recurring subscription`
|
||||
- do not hide stale timestamps
|
||||
- do not miss the biggest swing item just because it is ambiguous, flag it as the top verification priority
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- answer includes the freshest verified finance timestamp
|
||||
- each recommendation is labeled by evidence strength
|
||||
- final output separates `cancel now`, `verify this week`, and `keep for now`
|
||||
- if coverage is partial, the answer explicitly says so and names the fastest path to full certainty
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user