refactor: consolidate writing voice rules

.agents/skills/article-writing/SKILL.md

@@ -23,50 +23,23 @@ Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view,
 4. Use proof instead of adjectives.
 5. Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.
 
-## Voice Capture Workflow
+## Voice Handling
 
-If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:
-- published articles
-- newsletters
-- X posts or threads
-- docs or memos
-- launch notes
-- a style guide
-
-Then extract:
-- sentence length and rhythm
-- whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal
-- how parentheses are used
-- how often the writer asks questions
-- whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots
-- formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes
-- what the writer clearly avoids
+If the user wants a specific voice, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
+Do not duplicate a second style-analysis pass here unless the user explicitly asks for one.
 
 If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.
 
-## Affaan / ECC Voice Reference
-
-When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:
-- direct claims over scene-setting
-- high specificity
-- parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy
-- capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick
-- very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence
-- almost no bait questions
-
 ## Banned Patterns
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
 - "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"
-- "no fluff"
-- "not X, just Y"
 - "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge
 - fake vulnerability arcs
 - a closing question added only to juice engagement
-- forced lowercase
-- corny parenthetical asides
 - biography padding that does not move the argument
+- generic AI throat-clearing that delays the point
 
 ## Writing Process
 
@@ -101,6 +74,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 Before delivering:
 - factual claims are backed by provided sources
 - generic AI transitions are gone
-- the voice matches the supplied examples
+- the voice matches the supplied examples or the agreed `VOICE PROFILE`
 - every section adds something new
 - formatting matches the intended medium

.agents/skills/content-engine/SKILL.md

@@ -38,50 +38,28 @@ Before drafting, identify the source set:
 If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing.
 Use `brand-voice` as the canonical workflow when voice consistency matters across more than one output.
 
-## Voice Capture Workflow
+## Voice Handling
 
-Run `brand-voice` first when:
+`brand-voice` is the canonical voice layer.
+
+Run it first when:
 
 - there are multiple downstream outputs
 - the user explicitly cares about writing style
 - the content is launch, outreach, or reputation-sensitive
 
-At minimum, produce a compact `VOICE PROFILE` covering:
-- rhythm
-- compression
-- capitalization
-- parenthetical use
-- question use
-- preferred moves
-- banned moves
-
-Do not start drafting until the voice profile is clear enough to enforce.
-
-## Affaan / ECC Voice Reference
-
-When the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, default to this unless newer examples clearly override it:
-- direct, compressed, concrete
-- strong preference for specific claims, numbers, mechanisms, and receipts
-- parentheticals used to qualify, narrow, or over-clarify, not to do corny bits
-- lowercase is optional, not mandatory
-- questions are rare and should not be added as bait
-- transitions should feel earned, not polished
-- tone can be sharp or blunt, but should not sound like a content marketer
+Reuse the resulting `VOICE PROFILE` here instead of rebuilding a second voice model.
+If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, still treat `brand-voice` as the source of truth and feed it the best live or source-derived material available.
 
 ## Hard Bans
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
 - "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
-- "no fluff"
-- "not X, just Y"
 - "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
-- "Excited to share"
-- fake curiosity gaps
 - ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
-- forced lowercase when the source voice does not call for it
 - forced casualness on LinkedIn
-- parenthetical jokes that were not present in the source voice
+- fake engagement padding that was not present in the source material
 
 ## Platform Adaptation Rules
 

.agents/skills/crosspost/SKILL.md

@@ -39,13 +39,8 @@ Use `content-engine` first if the source still needs voice shaping.
 
 Run `brand-voice` first if the source voice is not already captured in the current session.
 
-Before adapting, note:
-- how blunt or explanatory the source is
-- whether the source uses fragments, lists, or longer transitions
-- whether the source uses parentheses
-- whether the source avoids questions, hashtags, or CTA language
-
-The adaptation should preserve that fingerprint.
+Reuse the resulting `VOICE PROFILE` directly.
+Do not build a second ad hoc voice checklist here unless the user explicitly wants a fresh override for this campaign.
 
 ### Step 3: Adapt by Platform Constraint
 
@@ -91,7 +86,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "Here's what I learned"
 - "What do you think?"
 - "link in bio" unless that is literally true
-- "not X, just Y"
 - generic "professional takeaway" paragraphs that were not in the source
 
 ## Output Format

.agents/skills/investor-outreach/SKILL.md

@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ Write investor communication that is short, concrete, and easy to act on.
 4. Stay concise.
 5. Never send copy that could go to any investor.
 
+## Voice Handling
+
+If the user's voice matters, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
+This skill should keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline, not recreate its own parallel voice system.
+
 ## Hard Bans
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
@@ -31,7 +36,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "excited to share"
 - generic thesis praise without a real tie-in
 - vague founder adjectives
-- "no fluff"
 - begging language
 - soft closing questions when a direct ask is clearer
 

WORKING-CONTEXT.md

@@ -111,3 +111,4 @@ Keep this file detailed for only the current sprint, blockers, and next actions.
 - 2026-04-01: Added `connections-optimizer` as the review-first social-graph reorganization workflow for X and LinkedIn, with explicit pruning modes, browser fallback expectations, and Apple Mail drafting guidance.
 - 2026-04-01: Added `manim-video` as the reusable technical explainer lane and seeded it with a starter network-graph scene so launch and systems animations do not depend on one-off scratch scripts.
 - 2026-04-02: Re-extracted `social-graph-ranker` as a standalone primitive because the weighted bridge-decay model is reusable outside the full lead workflow. `lead-intelligence` now points to it for canonical graph ranking instead of carrying the full algorithm explanation inline, while `connections-optimizer` stays the broader operator layer for pruning, adds, and outbound review packs.
+- 2026-04-02: Applied the same consolidation rule to the writing lane. `brand-voice` remains the canonical voice system, while `content-engine`, `crosspost`, `article-writing`, and `investor-outreach` now keep only workflow-specific guidance instead of duplicating a second Affaan/ECC voice model or repeating the full ban list in multiple places.

skills/article-writing/SKILL.md

@@ -23,50 +23,23 @@ Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view,
 4. Use proof instead of adjectives.
 5. Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.
 
-## Voice Capture Workflow
+## Voice Handling
 
-If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:
-- published articles
-- newsletters
-- X posts or threads
-- docs or memos
-- launch notes
-- a style guide
-
-Then extract:
-- sentence length and rhythm
-- whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal
-- how parentheses are used
-- how often the writer asks questions
-- whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots
-- formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes
-- what the writer clearly avoids
+If the user wants a specific voice, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
+Do not duplicate a second style-analysis pass here unless the user explicitly asks for one.
 
 If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.
 
-## Affaan / ECC Voice Reference
-
-When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:
-- direct claims over scene-setting
-- high specificity
-- parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy
-- capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick
-- very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence
-- almost no bait questions
-
 ## Banned Patterns
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
 - "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"
-- "no fluff"
-- "not X, just Y"
 - "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge
 - fake vulnerability arcs
 - a closing question added only to juice engagement
-- forced lowercase
-- corny parenthetical asides
 - biography padding that does not move the argument
+- generic AI throat-clearing that delays the point
 
 ## Writing Process
 
@@ -101,6 +74,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 Before delivering:
 - factual claims are backed by provided sources
 - generic AI transitions are gone
-- the voice matches the supplied examples
+- the voice matches the supplied examples or the agreed `VOICE PROFILE`
 - every section adds something new
 - formatting matches the intended medium

skills/content-engine/SKILL.md

@@ -38,50 +38,28 @@ Before drafting, identify the source set:
 If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing.
 Use `brand-voice` as the canonical workflow when voice consistency matters across more than one output.
 
-## Voice Capture Workflow
+## Voice Handling
 
-Run `brand-voice` first when:
+`brand-voice` is the canonical voice layer.
+
+Run it first when:
 
 - there are multiple downstream outputs
 - the user explicitly cares about writing style
 - the content is launch, outreach, or reputation-sensitive
 
-At minimum, produce a compact `VOICE PROFILE` covering:
-- rhythm
-- compression
-- capitalization
-- parenthetical use
-- question use
-- preferred moves
-- banned moves
-
-Do not start drafting until the voice profile is clear enough to enforce.
-
-## Affaan / ECC Voice Reference
-
-When the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, default to this unless newer examples clearly override it:
-- direct, compressed, concrete
-- strong preference for specific claims, numbers, mechanisms, and receipts
-- parentheticals used to qualify, narrow, or over-clarify, not to do corny bits
-- lowercase is optional, not mandatory
-- questions are rare and should not be added as bait
-- transitions should feel earned, not polished
-- tone can be sharp or blunt, but should not sound like a content marketer
+Reuse the resulting `VOICE PROFILE` here instead of rebuilding a second voice model.
+If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, still treat `brand-voice` as the source of truth and feed it the best live or source-derived material available.
 
 ## Hard Bans
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
 - "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
-- "no fluff"
-- "not X, just Y"
 - "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
-- "Excited to share"
-- fake curiosity gaps
 - ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
-- forced lowercase when the source voice does not call for it
 - forced casualness on LinkedIn
-- parenthetical jokes that were not present in the source voice
+- fake engagement padding that was not present in the source material
 
 ## Platform Adaptation Rules
 

skills/crosspost/SKILL.md

@@ -39,13 +39,8 @@ Use `content-engine` first if the source still needs voice shaping.
 
 Run `brand-voice` first if the source voice is not already captured in the current session.
 
-Before adapting, note:
-- how blunt or explanatory the source is
-- whether the source uses fragments, lists, or longer transitions
-- whether the source uses parentheses
-- whether the source avoids questions, hashtags, or CTA language
-
-The adaptation should preserve that fingerprint.
+Reuse the resulting `VOICE PROFILE` directly.
+Do not build a second ad hoc voice checklist here unless the user explicitly wants a fresh override for this campaign.
 
 ### Step 3: Adapt by Platform Constraint
 
@@ -91,7 +86,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "Here's what I learned"
 - "What do you think?"
 - "link in bio" unless that is literally true
-- "not X, just Y"
 - generic "professional takeaway" paragraphs that were not in the source
 
 ## Output Format

skills/investor-outreach/SKILL.md

@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ Write investor communication that is short, concrete, and easy to act on.
 4. Stay concise.
 5. Never send copy that could go to any investor.
 
+## Voice Handling
+
+If the user's voice matters, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
+This skill should keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline, not recreate its own parallel voice system.
+
 ## Hard Bans
 
 Delete and rewrite any of these:
@@ -31,7 +36,6 @@ Delete and rewrite any of these:
 - "excited to share"
 - generic thesis praise without a real tie-in
 - vague founder adjectives
-- "no fluff"
 - begging language
 - soft closing questions when a direct ask is clearer