Files
everything-claude-code/commands/review-pr.md
Affaan Mustafa 4813ed753f feat: consolidate all Anthropic plugins into ECC v2.0.0
Ports functionality from 10+ separate plugins into ECC so users only
need one plugin installed. Consolidates: pr-review-toolkit, feature-dev,
commit-commands, hookify, code-simplifier, security-guidance,
frontend-design, explanatory-output-style, and personal skills.

New agents (8): code-architect, code-explorer, code-simplifier,
comment-analyzer, conversation-analyzer, pr-test-analyzer,
silent-failure-hunter, type-design-analyzer

New commands (9): commit, commit-push-pr, clean-gone, review-pr,
feature-dev, hookify, hookify-list, hookify-configure, hookify-help

New skills (8): frontend-design, hookify-rules, github-ops,
knowledge-ops, lead-intelligence, oura-health, pmx-guidelines, remotion

Enhanced skills (8): article-writing, content-engine, market-research,
investor-materials, investor-outreach, x-api, security-scan,
autonomous-loops — merged with personal skill content

New hook: security-reminder.py (pattern-based OWASP vulnerability
warnings on file edits)

Totals: 36 agents, 69 commands, 128 skills, 29 hook scripts
2026-03-31 21:55:43 -07:00

1.5 KiB

description
description
Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents

Run a comprehensive, multi-perspective review of a pull request.

Usage

/review-pr [PR-number-or-URL] [--focus=comments|tests|errors|types|code|simplify]

If no PR specified, review the current branch's PR. If no focus specified, run all reviews.

Steps

  1. Identify the PR: Use gh pr view to get PR details, changed files, and diff

  2. Find project guidelines: Look for CLAUDE.md, .eslintrc, tsconfig.json, etc.

  3. Launch specialized review agents (in parallel where possible):

    Agent Focus
    code-reviewer Code quality, bugs, security, style guide adherence
    comment-analyzer Comment accuracy, completeness, maintainability
    pr-test-analyzer Test coverage quality and completeness
    silent-failure-hunter Silent failures, inadequate error handling
    type-design-analyzer Type design, invariants, encapsulation
    code-simplifier Code clarity, consistency, maintainability
  4. Aggregate results: Collect findings, deduplicate, rank by severity

  5. Report: Present organized findings grouped by severity (Critical > Important > Advisory)

Confidence Scoring

Only report issues with confidence ≥ 80:

  • Critical (90-100): Bugs, security vulnerabilities, data loss risks
  • Important (80-89): Style violations, missing tests, code quality
  • Advisory (<80): Suggestions, nice-to-haves (only if explicitly requested)