mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-04-08 10:23:30 +08:00
4813ed753f
Ports functionality from 10+ separate plugins into ECC so users only need one plugin installed. Consolidates: pr-review-toolkit, feature-dev, commit-commands, hookify, code-simplifier, security-guidance, frontend-design, explanatory-output-style, and personal skills. New agents (8): code-architect, code-explorer, code-simplifier, comment-analyzer, conversation-analyzer, pr-test-analyzer, silent-failure-hunter, type-design-analyzer New commands (9): commit, commit-push-pr, clean-gone, review-pr, feature-dev, hookify, hookify-list, hookify-configure, hookify-help New skills (8): frontend-design, hookify-rules, github-ops, knowledge-ops, lead-intelligence, oura-health, pmx-guidelines, remotion Enhanced skills (8): article-writing, content-engine, market-research, investor-materials, investor-outreach, x-api, security-scan, autonomous-loops — merged with personal skill content New hook: security-reminder.py (pattern-based OWASP vulnerability warnings on file edits) Totals: 36 agents, 69 commands, 128 skills, 29 hook scripts
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Run a comprehensive, multi-perspective review of a pull request.
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
`/review-pr [PR-number-or-URL] [--focus=comments|tests|errors|types|code|simplify]`
|
|
|
|
If no PR specified, review the current branch's PR. If no focus specified, run all reviews.
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
1. **Identify the PR**: Use `gh pr view` to get PR details, changed files, and diff
|
|
2. **Find project guidelines**: Look for CLAUDE.md, .eslintrc, tsconfig.json, etc.
|
|
3. **Launch specialized review agents** (in parallel where possible):
|
|
|
|
| Agent | Focus |
|
|
|-------|-------|
|
|
| code-reviewer | Code quality, bugs, security, style guide adherence |
|
|
| comment-analyzer | Comment accuracy, completeness, maintainability |
|
|
| pr-test-analyzer | Test coverage quality and completeness |
|
|
| silent-failure-hunter | Silent failures, inadequate error handling |
|
|
| type-design-analyzer | Type design, invariants, encapsulation |
|
|
| code-simplifier | Code clarity, consistency, maintainability |
|
|
|
|
4. **Aggregate results**: Collect findings, deduplicate, rank by severity
|
|
5. **Report**: Present organized findings grouped by severity (Critical > Important > Advisory)
|
|
|
|
## Confidence Scoring
|
|
|
|
Only report issues with confidence ≥ 80:
|
|
- **Critical (90-100)**: Bugs, security vulnerabilities, data loss risks
|
|
- **Important (80-89)**: Style violations, missing tests, code quality
|
|
- **Advisory (<80)**: Suggestions, nice-to-haves (only if explicitly requested)
|