Files
everything-claude-code/commands/aside.md
avesh-h bc21e7adba feat: add /aside command (#407)
* Introduces /aside — a mid-task side conversation command inspired by
  Claude Code's native /btw feature. Allows users to ask a question while
  Claude is actively working without losing task context or touching any files.

  Key behaviors:
  - Freezes current task state before answering (read-only during aside)
  - Delivers answers in a consistent ASIDE / Back to task format
  - Auto-resumes the active task after answering
  - Handles edge cases: no question given, answer reveals a blocker,
    question implies a task redirect, chained asides, ambiguous questions,
    and answers that suggest code changes without making them

* Two documentation inconsistencies fixed:

* Fixed 4 pre-existing lint errors in skills/videodb/ that were causing  CI to fail across all PR checks:  - api-reference.md: add blockquote continuation line to fix MD028  - capture-reference.md: wrap bare URL to fix MD034  - SKILL.md: wrap bare URL to fix MD034
2026-03-12 23:52:46 -07:00

165 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Answer a quick side question without interrupting or losing context from the current task. Resume work automatically after answering.
---
# Aside Command
Ask a question mid-task and get an immediate, focused answer — then continue right where you left off. The current task, files, and context are never modified.
## When to Use
- You're curious about something while Claude is working and don't want to lose momentum
- You need a quick explanation of code Claude is currently editing
- You want a second opinion or clarification on a decision without derailing the task
- You need to understand an error, concept, or pattern before Claude proceeds
- You want to ask something unrelated to the current task without starting a new session
## Usage
```
/aside <your question>
/aside what does this function actually return?
/aside is this pattern thread-safe?
/aside why are we using X instead of Y here?
/aside what's the difference between foo() and bar()?
/aside should we be worried about the N+1 query we just added?
```
## Process
### Step 1: Freeze the current task state
Before answering anything, mentally note:
- What is the active task? (what file, feature, or problem was being worked on)
- What step was in progress at the moment `/aside` was invoked?
- What was about to happen next?
Do NOT touch, edit, create, or delete any files during the aside.
### Step 2: Answer the question directly
Answer the question in the most concise form that is still complete and useful.
- Lead with the answer, not the reasoning
- Keep it short — if a full explanation is needed, offer to go deeper after the task
- If the question is about the current file or code being worked on, reference it precisely (file path and line number if relevant)
- If answering requires reading a file, read it — but read only, never write
Format the response as:
```
ASIDE: [restate the question briefly]
[Your answer here]
— Back to task: [one-line description of what was being done]
```
### Step 3: Resume the main task
After delivering the answer, immediately continue the active task from the exact point it was paused. Do not ask for permission to resume unless the aside answer revealed a blocker or a reason to reconsider the current approach (see Edge Cases).
---
## Edge Cases
**No question provided (`/aside` with nothing after it):**
Respond:
```
ASIDE: no question provided
What would you like to know? (ask your question and I'll answer without losing the current task context)
— Back to task: [one-line description of what was being done]
```
**Question reveals a potential problem with the current task:**
Flag it clearly before resuming:
```
ASIDE: [answer]
⚠️ Note: This answer suggests [issue] with the current approach. Want to address this before continuing, or proceed as planned?
```
Wait for the user's decision before resuming.
**Question is actually a task redirect (not a side question):**
If the question implies changing what is being built (e.g., `/aside actually, let's use Redis instead`), clarify:
```
ASIDE: That sounds like a direction change, not just a side question.
Do you want to:
(a) Answer this as information only and keep the current plan
(b) Pause the current task and change approach
```
Wait for the user's answer — do not make assumptions.
**Question is about the currently open file or code:**
Answer from the live context. If the file was read earlier in the session, reference it directly. If not, read it now (read-only) and answer with a file:line reference.
**No active task (nothing in progress when `/aside` is invoked):**
Still use the standard wrapper so the response shape stays consistent:
```
ASIDE: [restate the question briefly]
[Your answer here]
— Back to task: no active task to resume
```
**Question requires a long answer:**
Give the essential answer concisely, then offer:
```
That's the short version. Want a deeper explanation after we finish [current task]?
```
**Multiple `/aside` questions in a row:**
Answer each one in sequence. After the last answer, resume the main task. Do not lose task state across a chain of asides.
**Aside answer implies a code change is needed:**
Note the change needed but do not make it during the aside:
```
ASIDE: [answer]
📝 Worth fixing: [what should be changed]. I'll flag this after the current task unless you want to address it now.
```
**Question is ambiguous or too vague:**
Ask one clarifying question — the shortest question that gets the information needed to answer. Do not ask multiple questions.
---
## Example Output
```
User: /aside what does fetchWithRetry() actually do?
ASIDE: what does fetchWithRetry() do?
fetchWithRetry() (src/api/retry.ts:12) attempts the request up to 3 times with
exponential backoff (250ms → 500ms → 1s). It only retries on 5xx responses and
network errors — 4xx errors are treated as final and not retried.
— Back to task: refactoring the auth middleware in src/middleware/auth.ts
```
```
User: /aside is the approach we're taking thread-safe?
ASIDE: is the current approach thread-safe?
No — the shared cache object in src/cache/store.ts:34 is mutated without locking.
Under concurrent requests this is a race condition. It's low risk in a single-process
Node.js server but would be a real problem with worker threads or clustering.
⚠️ Note: This could affect the feature we're building. Want to address this now or continue and fix it in a follow-up?
```
---
## Notes
- Never modify files during an aside — read-only access only
- The aside is a conversation pause, not a new task — the original task must always resume
- Keep answers focused: the goal is to unblock the user quickly, not to deliver a lecture
- If an aside sparks a larger discussion, finish the current task first unless the aside reveals a blocker
- Asides are not saved to session files unless explicitly relevant to the task outcome