mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-04-02 15:13:28 +08:00
269 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
269 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: lead-intelligence
|
||
description: AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, and personalized outreach. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts.
|
||
origin: ECC
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Lead Intelligence
|
||
|
||
Agent-powered lead intelligence pipeline that finds, scores, and reaches high-value contacts through social graph analysis and warm path discovery.
|
||
|
||
## When to Activate
|
||
|
||
- User wants to find leads or prospects in a specific industry
|
||
- Building an outreach list for partnerships, sales, or fundraising
|
||
- Researching who to reach out to and the best path to reach them
|
||
- User says "find leads", "outreach list", "who should I reach out to", "warm intros"
|
||
- Needs to score or rank a list of contacts by relevance
|
||
- Wants to map mutual connections to find warm introduction paths
|
||
|
||
## Tool Requirements
|
||
|
||
### Required
|
||
- **Exa MCP** — Deep web search for people, companies, and signals (`web_search_exa`)
|
||
- **X API** — Follower/following graph, mutual analysis, recent activity (`X_BEARER_TOKEN`, `X_ACCESS_TOKEN`)
|
||
|
||
### Optional (enhance results)
|
||
- **LinkedIn** — Via browser-use MCP or direct API for connection graph
|
||
- **Apollo/Clay API** — For enrichment cross-reference if user has access
|
||
- **GitHub MCP** — For developer-centric lead qualification
|
||
|
||
## Pipeline Overview
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
|
||
│ 1. Signal │────>│ 2. Mutual │────>│ 3. Warm Path │────>│ 4. Enrich │────>│ 5. Outreach │
|
||
│ Scoring │ │ Ranking │ │ Discovery │ │ │ │ Draft │
|
||
└─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Stage 1: Signal Scoring
|
||
|
||
Search for high-signal people in target verticals. Assign a weight to each based on:
|
||
|
||
| Signal | Weight | Source |
|
||
|--------|--------|--------|
|
||
| Role/title alignment | 30% | Exa, LinkedIn |
|
||
| Industry match | 25% | Exa company search |
|
||
| Recent activity on topic | 20% | X API search, Exa |
|
||
| Follower count / influence | 10% | X API |
|
||
| Location proximity | 10% | Exa, LinkedIn |
|
||
| Engagement with your content | 5% | X API interactions |
|
||
|
||
### Signal Search Approach
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Step 1: Define target parameters
|
||
target_verticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"]
|
||
target_roles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"]
|
||
target_locations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
|
||
|
||
# Step 2: Exa deep search for people
|
||
for vertical in target_verticals:
|
||
results = web_search_exa(
|
||
query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO",
|
||
category="company",
|
||
numResults=20
|
||
)
|
||
# Score each result
|
||
|
||
# Step 3: X API search for active voices
|
||
x_search = search_recent_tweets(
|
||
query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools",
|
||
max_results=100
|
||
)
|
||
# Extract and score unique authors
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Stage 2: Mutual Ranking
|
||
|
||
For each scored target, analyze the user's social graph to find the warmest path.
|
||
|
||
### Algorithm
|
||
|
||
1. Pull user's X following list and LinkedIn connections
|
||
2. For each high-signal target, check for shared connections
|
||
3. Rank mutuals by:
|
||
|
||
| Factor | Weight |
|
||
|--------|--------|
|
||
| Number of connections to targets | 40% — highest weight, most connections = highest rank |
|
||
| Mutual's current role/company | 20% — decision maker vs individual contributor |
|
||
| Mutual's location | 15% — same city = easier intro |
|
||
| Industry alignment | 15% — same vertical = natural intro |
|
||
| Mutual's X handle / LinkedIn | 10% — identifiability for outreach |
|
||
|
||
### Weighted Bridge Ranking
|
||
|
||
Treat this as the canonical network-ranking stage for lead intelligence. Do not run a separate graph skill when this stage is enough.
|
||
|
||
Given:
|
||
- `T` = target leads
|
||
- `M` = your mutuals / existing connections
|
||
- `d(m, t)` = shortest hop distance from mutual `m` to target `t`
|
||
- `w(t)` = target weight from signal scoring
|
||
|
||
Compute the base bridge score for each mutual:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
B(m) = Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m,t) - 1)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
- `λ` is the decay factor, usually `0.5`
|
||
- a direct connection contributes full value
|
||
- each extra hop halves the contribution
|
||
|
||
For second-order reach, expand one level into the mutual's own network:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
B_ext(m) = B(m) + α · Σ_{m' ∈ N(m) \\ M} Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m',t))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
- `N(m) \\ M` is the set of people the mutual knows that you do not
|
||
- `α` is the second-order discount, usually `0.3`
|
||
|
||
Then rank by response-adjusted bridge value:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
R(m) = B_ext(m) · (1 + β · engagement(m))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
- `engagement(m)` is a normalized responsiveness score
|
||
- `β` is the engagement bonus, usually `0.2`
|
||
|
||
Interpretation:
|
||
- Tier 1: high `R(m)` and direct bridge paths -> warm intro asks
|
||
- Tier 2: medium `R(m)` and one-hop bridge paths -> conditional intro asks
|
||
- Tier 3: no viable bridge -> direct cold outreach using the same lead record
|
||
|
||
### Output Format
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
MUTUAL RANKING REPORT
|
||
=====================
|
||
|
||
#1 @mutual_handle (Score: 92)
|
||
Name: Jane Smith
|
||
Role: Partner @ Acme Ventures
|
||
Location: San Francisco
|
||
Connections to targets: 7
|
||
Connected to: @target1, @target2, @target3, @target4, @target5, @target6, @target7
|
||
Best intro path: Jane invested in Target1's company
|
||
|
||
#2 @mutual_handle2 (Score: 85)
|
||
...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Stage 3: Warm Path Discovery
|
||
|
||
For each target, find the shortest introduction chain:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
You ──[follows]──> Mutual A ──[invested in]──> Target Company
|
||
You ──[follows]──> Mutual B ──[co-founded with]──> Target Person
|
||
You ──[met at]──> Event ──[also attended]──> Target Person
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Path Types (ordered by warmth)
|
||
1. **Direct mutual** — You both follow/know the same person
|
||
2. **Portfolio connection** — Mutual invested in or advises target's company
|
||
3. **Co-worker/alumni** — Mutual worked at same company or attended same school
|
||
4. **Event overlap** — Both attended same conference/program
|
||
5. **Content engagement** — Target engaged with mutual's content or vice versa
|
||
|
||
## Stage 4: Enrichment
|
||
|
||
For each qualified lead, pull:
|
||
|
||
- Full name, current title, company
|
||
- Company size, funding stage, recent news
|
||
- Recent X posts (last 30 days) — topics, tone, interests
|
||
- Mutual interests with user (shared follows, similar content)
|
||
- Recent company events (product launch, funding round, hiring)
|
||
|
||
### Enrichment Sources
|
||
- Exa: company data, news, blog posts
|
||
- X API: recent tweets, bio, followers
|
||
- GitHub: open source contributions (for developer-centric leads)
|
||
- LinkedIn (via browser-use): full profile, experience, education
|
||
|
||
## Stage 5: Outreach Draft
|
||
|
||
Generate personalized outreach for each lead. Two modes:
|
||
|
||
### Warm Intro Request (to mutual)
|
||
```
|
||
hey [mutual name],
|
||
|
||
quick ask. i see you know [target name] at [company].
|
||
i'm building [your product] which [1-line relevance to target].
|
||
would you be open to a quick intro? happy to send you a
|
||
forwardable blurb.
|
||
|
||
[your name]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Direct Cold Outreach (to target)
|
||
```
|
||
hey [target name],
|
||
|
||
[specific reference to their recent work/post/announcement].
|
||
i'm [your name], building [product]. [1 line on why this is
|
||
relevant to them specifically].
|
||
|
||
[specific low-friction ask].
|
||
|
||
[your name]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Anti-Patterns (never do)
|
||
- Generic templates with no personalization
|
||
- Long paragraphs explaining your whole company
|
||
- Multiple asks in one message
|
||
- Fake familiarity ("loved your recent talk!" without specifics)
|
||
- Bulk-sent messages with visible merge fields
|
||
|
||
## Configuration
|
||
|
||
Users should set these environment variables:
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Required
|
||
export X_BEARER_TOKEN="..."
|
||
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN="..."
|
||
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET="..."
|
||
export X_API_KEY="..."
|
||
export X_API_SECRET="..."
|
||
export EXA_API_KEY="..."
|
||
|
||
# Optional
|
||
export LINKEDIN_COOKIE="..." # For browser-use LinkedIn access
|
||
export APOLLO_API_KEY="..." # For Apollo enrichment
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Agents
|
||
|
||
This skill includes specialized agents in the `agents/` subdirectory:
|
||
|
||
- **signal-scorer** — Searches and ranks prospects by relevance signals
|
||
- **mutual-mapper** — Maps social graph connections and finds warm paths
|
||
- **enrichment-agent** — Pulls detailed profile and company data
|
||
- **outreach-drafter** — Generates personalized messages
|
||
|
||
## Example Usage
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
User: find me the top 20 people in prediction markets I should reach out to
|
||
|
||
Agent workflow:
|
||
1. signal-scorer searches Exa and X for prediction market leaders
|
||
2. mutual-mapper checks user's X graph for shared connections
|
||
3. enrichment-agent pulls company data and recent activity
|
||
4. outreach-drafter generates personalized messages for top ranked leads
|
||
|
||
Output: Ranked list with warm paths and draft outreach for each
|
||
```
|